Editor's Choice
Platinum announces strategic review
Platinum said following the review Platinum Capital and Platinum Asia Investments may be wound up.
Sequoia chief's job at stake in upcoming EGM
Sequoia Financial Group will hold an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) in June that will consider a resolution to remove chief executive and managing director Garry Crole.
Scott Farquhar steps down from Atlassian
After more than two decades at the helm, Scott Farquhar will step down as co-chief executive of Atlassian.
Goldman Sachs ditches robo-adviser Marcus Invest
The investment bank is offloading Marcus Invest to Betterment just three years after announcing it will launch the digital adviser.
Further Reading
Sponsored by | Where do advisers invest their time?The stage 3 tax cuts have sparked discussions on bracket creep. Implementing a tax-effective investment strategy is crucial now more than ever. |
Sponsored by | Quality and Yield. A Powerful combination.With central bank rates seemingly peaked, investors are not awaiting yield increases. We're bucking the trend with investment rates at decadal highs |
Sponsored by | Why it could be a good time to be a growth contrarianGrowth-style companies are in vogue, but you may need to think outside the box to ensure you don't overpay. |
Products
Featured Profile
Fiona Mann
HEAD OF LISTED EQUITIES AND ESG
BRIGHTER SUPER
BRIGHTER SUPER
Brighter Super head of listed equities and ESG Fiona Mann was shaped by a childhood steeped in military-like discipline and global nomadism. Andrew McKean writes.
Whiteley and his cohorts do not actually run a financial planning practice and don't even talk to clients directly. They are therefore totally unqualified to pass judgement on regulations which affect real Professional Financial Planners.
What this so called legal advice does not mention is that the proposed seventh part of Best Interest is open for testing in the courts due to its ambiguities and therefore firms such as Arnold Bloch Liebler have a vested interest in keeping this in the regulations to generate future business for themselves.
How is it that a member of the Liberal Party (one with no experience in the Fin Services Industry) is defending the 40 or so Industry Funds which were presumably set up to provide income streams for Unionists and ex Labor politicians in their roles as Fund Trustees/Directors, etc., and for the political purpose of using members funds for running down the high quality advisory industry in Australia, influencing share holders meetings, and influencing Funds Managers (those who accept Industry Funds money). Presumably the Hon Peter Collins is being paid very big bucks as chairman of ISA!
FOFA in turn was set up to continue the onslaught against the advisory industry, arguably the very best in the World and one which does infinitely more than simply hard sell an inferior investment product such as Industry Funds. Ignore this noise, Senator Sinodinos and get on with your job.
Also make sure that the proposed Royal commission closely examines any possible corruption in Industry Funds. Separately APRA should be checking to see whether Industry Funds meet the sole purpose test.